Objectivity in art

Anything objective is useful in subjective application If art has application (inspiration, motivation, personal fulfillment), there can be objective art. It’s role with convention - what it has to say = a statement Art is created to share When art does not have subjective value, it becomes ‘stupid/bad/derivative’ this kind of art is morally offensive to the viewer = derivative, and corruptive form of art that WILL or HAS ruined the artistic landscape

Justifying why art is bad via critique → personal attack → Justifying identity → with leisure time, time that is meant for expression is wasted on ‘bad art’ → leisure = an exercise in freedom

Delicacy and refined tastes → art should be review over time → the more someone indulges art, the more refined their taste → art has a more specific and specialized utility/objectivity. Hume.

Pragmatism

Cultural objectivity and fact

The more the art is articulated, the more it becomes ‘real’ and objective.