2024-05-2810:50 Status:Complete Tags: Proofs
Suppose that were rational.
Then there would exist some integers and such that .
Consequently, the set and are positive integers is a nonempty set of positive integers (as is a member of ).
Therefore by the well-ordering property, has a smallest element, say .
.
Because and are both integers, must also be an integer.
Furthermore, it is positive as and .
It is less than as and .
This contradicts the choice of as the smallest positive integer in .
It follows that the converse, is irrational.
QED
Let’s suppose is a rational number. Then we can write it = where are positive integers and, . We additionally assume that is simplified to the lowest terms, since that can obviously be done with any fraction. Notice that in order for to be in the simplest terms, both of and cannot be even. One or both must be odd. Otherwise, we could simplify further. From the equality = it follows that . So the square of is an even number since it is two times something. From this, we know that itself is also an even number. Why? Because it can’t be odd; if itself was odd, then would be odd too. Odd number times odd number is always odd. If itself is an even number, then is 2 times some other whole number. (, where k is this other number. Where is just some number)
If we substitute into the original equation, we get:
This would imply that is even. As it is impossible to make an even square with odd numbers, must be even as well. This contradicts, as assuming that is in its lowest terms would imply that 2 is not a factor. It follows that the converse, is irrational QED